IFRS S2 shall be applied for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024 (earlier application is permitted, only if IFRS S1 is simultaneously implemented). Disclosures are not required before the date of initial application (the start of the first reporting period), so disclosure of comparative info is not required in the first annual reporting period.
The objective of IFRS S2 is disclose both climate-related risks as well as opportunities, to which an entity is exposed; which are useful to the primary users of financial reports in making decisions related to providing resources to the entity (IFRSS2.1)
(IFRSS2.2) "Climate-related risks and opportunities that could reasonably be expected to affect the entity's prospects" are those which could responably be expected to affect the entity's:
Climate-related risks & opportunities that could not reasonably be expected to affect an entity's prospects are outside the scope of IFRS S2.
Climate-related risks include both:
An entity's climate-related governance is driven by a governance body, with management have responsibilities delegated to it.
For the governance body the following should be disclosed with respect to how it oversees the entity's climate-related risks & opportunities:
With respect to management's role:
An entity should avoid duplication; ie have one single integrated set of governance disclosures; not separate disclosures for each sustainability-related risk and opportunity
Disclosures regarding strategy are to help users of financial statements to understand the strategy for dealing with climate-related risks & opportunities:
The first step in the strategy is to identify and describe what climate-related risks and opportunities could affect the business's prospects, whether they are physical or transition risks, and what the time horizon over which the risk/opportunity could realise. This will involve using "all reasonable and supportable information that is available to the entity at the reporting date without undue cost or effort”, and referring to and considering "the applicability of the industry-based disclosure topics defined in the Industry-based Guidance on Implementing IFRS S2”.
Click here to learn more about satisfying the requirements of paragraph 10, 11 and 12 of IFRS S2.
Disclosures help understand an entity's climate-related performance & progression towards internally set or regulated targets. They require:
The entity must disclose:
Disaggregate Scope 1 and 2 emissions between the:
In prepping 29(b)-(g) disclosures:
determine whether industry-based metrics, as described in paragraph 32
- including those defined in an applicable IFRS Sustainability
Disclosure Standard or those that otherwise satisfy the requirements
in IFRS S1 - could be used to satisfy the requirements in whole or partially
These connections include consistency in
the data and assumptions used and linkages
between the amounts disclosed in accordance with paragraph 29(b)-(g)
and the amounts recognised and disclosed in the financial statements.
For example, is the carrying amount of
assets consistent with amounts included in the financial
statements and what are the connections between info in
these disclosures and amounts in the financial statements.
These examples of metrics paragraphs 29(b)-(e) disclosures are from chapter C of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and were copied from there into IFRS S2's accompanying guidance.
| Metric category | Example unit of measurement | Example metrics | |
| Transition Risks: Amount and extent of assets or business activities vulnerable to transition risks |
Amount and percentage |
• Volume of real estate collaterals highly exposed to transition risk |
|
| Physical Risks: Amount and extent of assets or business activities vulnerable to physical risks |
Amount and percentage | • Number and value of mortgage loans in 100-year flood zones • Wastewater treatment capacity located in 100-year flood zones • Revenue associated with water withdrawn and consumed in regions of high or extremely high baseline water stress • Proportion of property, infrastructure, or other alternative asset portfolios in an area subject to flooding, heat stress, or water stress • Proportion of real assets exposed to 1:100 or 1:200 climate-related hazards |
|
| Opportunities : Proportion of revenue, assets, or other business activities aligned with climate-related opportunities |
Amount and percentage |
|
|
| Capital Deployment : Amount of capital expenditure, financing, or investment deployed toward climate-related risks and opportunities |
Reporting currency | • Percentage of annual revenue invested in R&Dof low-carbon products/services • Investment in climate adaptation measures (e.g., soil health, irrigation, technology) |
Businesses should share industry-specific measures related to their activities or unique features. When deciding which measures to share, they should use the guidance provided in the 'Industry-based Guidance on Implementing IFRS S2' document as a reference.
The term "impracticability" frequently surfaced in discussions surrounding IFRS17, particularly in relation to the execution of a fully retrospective approach (FRA). Auditors, understandably, were keen to ensure this wasn't use as a "cop-out". Similar dynamics may emerge under IFRSS2 as it has its own "impracticability" test, specifically targeting the measurement of scope 3 emissions (B57):
"This Standard includes the presumption that Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions can be estimated reliably using secondary data and industry averages. In those rare cases when an entity determines it is impracticable to estimate its Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, the entity shall disclose how it is managing its Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions. Applying a requirement is impracticable when the entity cannot apply it after making every reasonable effort to do so."